The Diagnosis, The Punishment and The RehabilitationBack to homepage

My comments may be in any colour, quotations are always in pale blue.


Let me take you on a journey through the corridors of my mind.
The things that we shall find shall scare you,
And some will frighten you to death.
So let me take you on a journey through my mind.
Alan Jones

Site Sitemap Map

Have you no faith in
your own medicine?
Marquis de Sade to Abbe de Coulmier, Quills

 

A Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing

 

What has made men at all times willing to undergo fearful hardships and risk of death to explore the unknown? ... there is a strong urge for adventure and curiosity about the unknown which belongs to all heathy-minded people: the ambition, as James Cook once put it, "Not only to go farther than anyone has been, but as far as it was possible for a man to go".

Captain Scott wrote in his diary a day or so before he and his companions died of cold and starvation in the Antarctic "How much better has all this been than lounging in too much comfort at home". This was the motive that sent men to reach the North Pole and the South Pole, the top of Mount Everest, the source of the River Nile, and finally out into space.

Patrick Moore, Exploring The World, The Oxford Children's Reference Library (2), OUP, 1966.

I am not a medical doctor, lawyer or therapist (although I have trained as a counsellor), that is certain, but I have approached this section, in this way, so as to gather my thoughts and to come to terms with the events.

I will not modify the history and will add updates when possible. I reserve the right to add material and to correct grammar, spelling etc.

The therapeutic aspects of the research (and in creating this website) have allowed me to emerge from the torment of the first six weeks and begin to address everyday affairs, along with the love and support of family and friends, and a substantial amount of junkfood.

I had no idea if this would have an outcome on the legal aspect, probably not (it didn't), but at least we were all ‘singing from the same song sheet’.

 

 


The period from September 2000 to the middle of July 2002

2000: New promotion job in middle management post, new place, failing department - big challenge, but potential very good. My statement to friend was "this will make me or break me". Long way behind last two institutions, in many ways, but again, potential. Time running out for further necessary promotion, need to be successful quickly, possible here. Due to imminent changes, the likelihood of what I had been offered diminishes as the months pass. New Senior Manager appointed. No matter, I am a professional, almost all my colleagues are supportive, friendly and eager. The first year is always hard. The institution is criticised and the screws are turned. Experience the worse Summer vacation of all career. 2002: Repercussions of criticism start. Massive, rapid pressure increase. Only really starting quality improvement departmental systems. Manage to create best with resources and time available, some very good improvements. Further scrutiny, heavy-handed tactics from pseudo-external agencies and others. Department criticised heavily, with personal criticism. Line manger essentially supportive, but has bigger fish to fry for now and has little room for manoeuvre. Stress of introduction of new procedures, both personal and departmental, telling. Give guarded messages to management about difficulties (don’t want to jeopardise promotion). Stresses increase. Techniques successfully used, very recently, elsewhere, are now deemed inapplicable or even incorrect. Never criticised as much, or shown such scant professional regard - ever. Some unavoidable knee-jerk activity from management. Have managed to secure a number of departmental requirements, but they were fundamental, many should have already been in place, but the battle has drained me. Weeks to go, flagging heavily. Next year will be even more scrutiny and demand, not managing in time available at this time and much more to do. Depending now much more heavily on survival strategies of self-gratification, spending, eating and masturbation. Most nights and weekends occupied in release and escape. Only essential after work work being completed and with stretched deadlines. I cannot face another Summer vacation like the last one. Only have to hold out for a few results in the next few weeks - only need to hold out. Not happy with house, neighbours, hobbies (though now they should have been approaching 'perfection', overall). Not listening to music, reading or watching TV. Money issues in much better control, but starting to escalate slowly again. One morning at work, something clicks - I feel it go - time to buy new PC.

Phase 1 Diagnosis

Stress-induced depressed state (Stress at work).

Denial of need for help, due to extreme overachiever tendencies. Willing to avoid failure at 'any cost', but have to maintain a principled approach at work. Instant gratification used to 'tide me over' until results emerge. This small success will get me 'back on track'. Just ride the storm.

Use of extreme and still-developing cybersexual addiction/dependency as instant gratification, so as to find release from the, now severe, stress and psychological escape from the situation.

Tolerance requires more effective source materials/strategies.


The period from the middle of July 2002 to the end of July 2002

New PC and webcam open up a new realm of possibilities, First paraphilia explored, but this does not lead to any real result. Assess price of Viagra, order small quantity, continue with exploration. Viagra arrives, Try 100 mg on first occasion, investigate a number of paraphilias. The next 2 days (a weekend) are a blur. Euphoric state of mind. On numerous occasions, actually said, to myself, with complete honesty, "even if I get caught, they can never take this away from me". Only days to survive work now. Activities through one night means I am unable to go to work in the morning - first time I have ever missed work for no good reason. Order Viagra at a cost in the region of £450.

Phase 2 Diagnosis

I have no medical explanation for the intensity of the event. I know the effect of the Viagra was instrumental in inducing both the erections and the subsequent intensity of the activities. It was an intensely salient period. There was no need for conflict or withdrawal, because no one could interfere. I have not seen this effect of Viagra (alone) documented. I do know what I felt like - it was paradise. I remember very little about that time, either the nights at home or the days at work.


The period from the end of July 2002 until the middle of August 2002

Spent first three days of Summer vacation completing some deadline work, deadline within days - must complete. On completion, I ask myself is this what this job has come to? Down to this hoop-jumping exercise? Deliver materials and now 24 hours a day is open to my pleasure. Failed attempt at heterosexual lovemaking , even with multi-paraphilic fantasy towards the end. Feeling of devastation. Back to activities, euphoria returns. Salient, no worries of conflict or withdrawal, daily Viagra 100mg dosage. Essentially no trips out, day and night a mixture of gratification and a little music. start too look at online news. See H&J issue for first time, forget about it, people talking online, visit news again, look more closely this time. Something starts to shift. No paraphilia providing euphoria. Some very pleasing gratification, but now reducing in intensity. People start to phone and visit, time to be coming back I think.

Phase 3 Diagnosis

Initial salient Viagra effect diminishes. Erections still very pleasing and orgasms high quality, but much less intense. I achieved some baseline/normal mental state, not euphoric, but not in the previous depressed state. Clearly, reasonably happy, judgement clearly impaired.


The Eventful Day

Spent the morning on music. Setting up new studio, very little computer activity. Not even enough to clean machine surface. Full knowledge of nature of material in containers, no need to clean surface. Will go for quick drive, to get some air and sun, feeling reasonably good. Drive out to country and then feel shopping urge. Arrive. Mobile in one pocket, camera in other. No thoughts of taking pictures. Some minor window shopping. Decided it might be fun to try some covert, non-flash pictures. Do so over a short period, perhaps 10-15 minutes. No attempt to hide camera, other than being down at hip level. Checking and deleting in clear view, in corridors, of centre. Two pictures in memory, blurred and low quality. Not working - camera away, off to spend some money. Visit, perhaps, 2-3 shops and decide to walk back down centre. I am approached by a number of people. Accusation frightens me, I delete camera contents as I take it out.

Phase 4 Diagnosis

I have no idea what possessed me to be so careless. Whether taking the alleged pictures, or not, how could I ever have walked around so blatantly, taking pictures anywhere, let alone allowing myself to approach the shop in question? I do not make those kind of mistakes. Even with a clean PC, it would have been dangerous. I can only say, as I look back now, in my mind, I honestly believed I was doing nothing wrong, hence, would not be caught, hence, it was feasible. It is so obvious now, that I was so obvious; as I have said, a true confusion.


Since the Eventful Day

Withdrawal symptoms apparent - once Viagra supply exhausted, erections cease, Prozac begins to kick in, masturbation back to low quality, non-erectile conditions - many days, it does not occur. Effect of paraphilic images back to intensity observed prior to experimentation i.e. essentially useless. No webcam usage. Cybersexual discussions rarely successful.

Initial six weeks, full of torment, tears, anger and hypersomnia. Now (3 months) - Dysthymic and some insomnia.

Phase 5 Diagnosis

Adjustment difficulties with depressive symptoms.

Dysthymia due to the certain belief that the future can only be bad. Having had mild reactive depressions before, even at the time, there was always a way forward, no matter how difficult it may have seemed. At this time, I can see no viable future in which I can survive, let alone cope or live.

Presently, no relapse.

Some return of senses, taste, smell etc. Some erectile improvement. Keeping occupied with creating website and preparing to leave (3.5 months).

Once all the major logistical issues were dealt with and I was in the hostel, I became calmer and positive, in some ways. It is like being a teenager again (4 months).

I feel as though I am somewhere in the middle of an adventure, an interesting academic exercise and a farce. Let us see what the Crown Court brings.

The Judge agreed with my barrister, that a full psychosexual report was required before the next hearing; I was to see The Good Doctor again (5.5 months).

Report arrived, see below.

The two reports were never heard of again, and neither were two character witness statements, which were collected. The offence was clear, the sentencing was clear and I pleaded guilty - there were to be no mitigating circumstances.

There was no second adjournment and I was sentenced to 15 months custodial (with 7.5 months to serve) and 21 months extended license. On the evening of 14/2/03 (almost 6 months from the day of arrest), I was a resident at the core local institute, HMP & YOI Doncaster, to await relocation.


Journal


The Marquis de Sade and Me

 

"Either kill me, or take me as I am, because I'll be damned if I ever change - I have told you, the beast is too old - there is no room for hope - the most honest, the most candid, the most sensitive of men, the most compassionate, the most beneficent worshipper of my children, for whose happiness I would go through fire ... adoring my parents ... adoring those who are left of my friends ... So there you have my virtues - now as to my vices - arrogant irascibility - extremely hot-tempered in everything, with a dissoluteness of imagination with regard to morals such as has never been seen before, atheist to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in brief. To repeat, either kill me, or take me as I am, because I will never change."

The Marquis de Sade, from a letter to his wife, written in prison, November 1783

During one of my discussions with my specialist, it was suggested (and I paraphrase for the sake of confidentiality) that there were some parallels with my account and that of the thoughts (not the actions!) of the Marquis de Sade. What is surprising about this, initially, is the sado-masochistic element of my episode was new to me. For this reason, I had read almost nothing of the escapades of the French aristocrat, other than his name leading to the word 'Sadism'. For this reason, when my doctor asked, "was I aware of his story?" I had to say "no", for that was the truth of the matter; this, of course, meant further research and I am now reading Francine du Plessix Gray's account.

I do not wish to create, yet another, biography, which are admirably covered in the references below (and those contained within), but I should like to include a few interesting observations. This is a developing section.

 

The Marquis de Sade: Sex, Sacrilege and Sublimity - Irregular Childhood

Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade was born on June 2, 1740, to Jean Baptiste, Comte (Count) de Sade, and to Marie-Elonore de Maille de Carman, Comtesse de Sade, his mother and a distant cousin of the Prince de Conde, a junior branch of the royal Bourbon family. His mother served as a lady in waiting to the Princess de Conde, and as a governess to her child, the young prince de Conde, Donatien’s senior by four years. The young Marquis’ first splash into the history books came as a result of a skirmish between him and his cousin, the Prince de Conde, who had tried to retrieve one of his favorite playthings from the grasp of the four-year-old Donatien. Rather than submitting in acknowledgement of the Prince’s rank, the Marquis refused to relinquish the toy, and instead proceeded to pummel his cousin with blows of increasing violence and ferocity. The two had to be separated by adult courtiers, and it was soon after this incident that the Marquis found himself remanded to the care of his extended family. It would not be the first time that the royal authorities would resort to such treatment as a means to controlling the combustible Marquis.

As a result of his confrontation with the prince, Donatien was sent to live with his paternal grandmother in Avignon. It was here that the Marquis would spend his early, formative years, surrounded by a gaggle of female relatives who indulged his every whim and smothered him with sensual affection.

Her five daughters visited Grandmother Sade often. Her youngest child, Donatien’s aunt Henriette-Victoire, a notoriously promiscuous beauty, was particularly fond of her turbulent little nephew and loved to indulge him. The dowager marquise’s other four daughters were nuns. Convents being relatively worldly in pre-Revolutionary days, these ladies, during their frequent forays into the secular world, doted on Donatien as lavishly as the rest of his female kin. The doting grandmother and the coddling aunts lavished all manner of affection on the child. Plying him with toys, candy, and caresses, they indulged his most capricious whims, with the result that the apprentice tyrant ... became more unruly than ever.

The Comte de Sade, Donatien’s father, was abroad serving as an ambassador to the court of the Elector of Bavaria during this time, but received reports of his son’s upbringing. He became increasingly enraged to hear of how his only son was being corrupted at the hands of his indulgent mother and sisters. Only two years after Donatien had been ordered to move in with his grandmother, his father uprooted him once again. The Comte wished to infuse his son’s upbringing with the masculine presence and influence that he himself was not able to provide. Thus, Donatien was sent to live with the Comte’s brother, Abbe Jacques-Francois de Sade, a noted scholar and author of his time. The abbe divided his time between his official residence in Auvergne, and the family castle of Saumane, thirty-five kilometers outside of Avignon.

Abbe de Sade was a contemporary and friend of the noted French philosopher Voltaire. Like his sisters, the abbe possessed a sensual, worldly side, which Voltaire encouraged and celebrated with poems such as the following: “However much of a priest you are, O Sir, you’ll continue to love. That is your true ministry, be you a bishop or the Holy Father. You will love, you will seduce, and you’ll equally succeed, in the Church and in Cythera (another name for Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love, fertility, and beauty).”

And so, the Marquis found himself placed in yet another setting where adults treated sex and sexuality as recreational means to a pleasurable end, and where sensual indulgence was the expectation rather than the exception to the rule. When not looking after his official church duties, which only required his presence in Auvergne a few months out of the year, the abbe occupied his leisure time with the pursuit of a variety of French beauties, women hailing from all settings within the social strata. He was widely known as the “sybarite (one inordinately attached to pleasure and luxury) of Saumane.” During the years that Sade lived with his uncle, the abbe housed a number of female companions, including a mother and daughter duo, a maid, and a local prostitute.

When no real people were available for the abbe to interact with, he had simply to turn to his voluminous library to stoke his appetite for worldly, sensual delights. While the scholarly clergyman kept some of the most learned classics of the age among his collection, he also made room for literature with titles such as the Book of Postures, Venus in the Cloister, or the Nun in Her Nightdress, and even John the Fucker Debauched. Donatien was free to read at his leisure, and, in the absence of other playmates his age, he more often than not found recreational refuge within the pages of most of the texts kept in his uncle’s library, including those which, according to the French euphemism, “were meant to be read with one hand.”

While a more unseemly setting could scarcely be conceived for the upbringing of an impressionable young child, Abbe de Sade was hardly a renegade clergyman. Indeed, for centuries, throughout France and other European countries, the men and women of the cloth availed themselves to the pleasures of the flesh to no less extent, and probably more so, than the lay worshippers to whom they were responsible for providing moral guidance. It was not unheard of for orgies to be held within the walls of convents and abbeys, wherein priest, nuns, prostitutes and nobles commingled to partake of the most scandalous and debauched activities.

Increasingly concerned that his son’s upbringing was no less corrupted by his brother’s influence than that of his mother and sisters’, the Comte de Sade decided to once again uproot Donatien and transplant him into seemingly more appropriate environs for a boy of his age. At the age of ten he moved from Saumane to Paris, where he was enrolled at the College Louis-le-Grand, a Jesuit prep school for young men of noble lineage. While their reputation as educators was unsurpassed anywhere in Europe, the Jesuits were no less worldly than the Abbe de Sade. Sodomy and corporal punishment were equally noteworthy trademarks as scholarship and statesmanship at the College.

As practiced by the Jesuits, who held their whippings in front of the assembled student body and had a notoriously heavy hand, the experience was particularly humiliating. Moreover, floggings can be sexually arousing and often generate what came to be called sadomasochistic behavior. As an adult, Sade would seldom be satisfied by ‘normal’ sex, and in many ways his carnal preferences seemed arrested at an infantile anal level.

Another important hallmark of the Jesuit regimen was that of confessing one’s sins as a means to analyzing and ultimately eradicating one’s imperfections. To gain the full benefit of confession requires the confessor to reflect upon some of the more unpleasant and murky aspects of his character, and then bring these very private aspects of the self to the surface where they are to be painfully scrutinized by the peering eyes of another. It was this aspect that seemed to have the most profound impact on Sade in regard to his perception of human nature and the lengths he was willing to go in order to not only fully understand, but also fully live the shadow life hidden in the deepest recesses of the human heart. As an adult he once wrote,

The profound study of man’s heart- nature’s labyrinth- alone can inspire the novelist, whose work must make us see man not only as he is, or as he purports to be- which is the duty of the historian- but as he is capable of being when subjected to the modifying influences of vice and the full impact of passion. Therefore, we must know them all, we must employ every passion and vice, if we labor in this field.

After four unremarkable years at the College, his father transferred Donatien to a military academy. In 1755, at the age of 15, Sade entered the King’s light cavalry regiment as a sub lieutenant. He was soon called to action through the outbreak of the Seven Year’s War. He established himself as a fearless and decisive leader during the battle for the British fortress at Port Mahon. With hundreds of French casualties lying about the battlefield, Sade and a fellow comrade in arms led an assault that ultimately resulted in the French taking of Port Mahon. Not content to see Donatien succeed with the cavalry, Comte de Sade used his few remaining connections to have his son placed with the Carabiniers de Monsieur, which was commanded by a member of the royal family. He prevailed, and Donatien was made the standard bearer for an entire cavalry company with the Carabiniers.

The bravery he demonstrated in battle coupled with his good looks and budding social charm, made for a successful career as a soldier for the young Marquis. He received glowing reviews from his superiors, and was promoted to the rank of captain by the age of eighteen, and was stationed in Germany where he began to unleash his increasing sexual appetite. Yet, despite his success, he received stern rebukes from his father with increasing frequency. Upon hearing that Donatien had been gambling some of his wages, the Comte wrote a furious missive to the abbe, stating in part, “As if that scoundrel had a louis a day to lose! He promised me not to risk a cent. But you can’t trust him to keep his word.”

Such words had serious ramifications on the young Marquis, who dreaded the prospect of losing the love of the only parent he knew. The relationship he shared with his father took precedence over other friendships, as demonstrated by a letter he wrote was still a soldier: “Friends are like women: when put to the test, the goods often prove defective. I open my heart to you, not as to a father whom one often fears and does not love, but to the most honest of friends, the most tender friend I deem to have in the world.”

Copyright 1999, Dark Horse Multimedia Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.crimelibrary.com/classics/marquis/

 

The Marquis de Sade: Sex, Sacrilege and Sublimity, Epilogue - The Literal Marquis: The Symbols and Psychology of his Written Imagery

The Marquis de Sade’s prison term would last for thirteen long years. He was moved to a variety of prisons during that time, his final destination being the infamous Bastille, from which the forces of the French Revolution in the late 1780s would finally free him. During his imprisonment, Sade’s physical appearance deteriorated severely, and he left his confinement as a corpulent, self-indulgent wretch, with no immediate means of supporting himself. However, Sade, like his father before him, was well practiced in the art of being a social chameleon. Accordingly, he managed to form relationships with those who saw fit to help support him until his death in December 1814. He also held elective office in one of the newly formed revolutionary districts of Paris. By these and other means, the Marquis managed to keep food on his plate and a roof over his head, scarcely the noble standards he had grown so accustomed to in his younger days.

Despite the myriad changes of circumstance, and despite his self-imposed physical limitations, the one unchanging component of Sade’s character was his libido, his sexual imagination. During his period of imprisonment he had secretly penned a number of pornographic texts that he published in the period after his release. His major works include The 120 Days of Sodom, Justine (or the Misfortunes of Virtue), and Philosophy in the Boudoir, among others. Anticipating an angry social backlash against their contents, Sade wisely published his works under a nomme de plume, and indeed, literary critics vilified his writings for generations to follow. Copies of his texts remained generally unavailable, and where they could be found they were usually kept under lock and key, for adults only.

However, this century has seen the emergence of scholars and critics who have been willing to passionately dissect and defend the value of Sade’s work, perhaps making the Marquis one of history’s only true criminals to be exonerated and celebrated on legitimate intellectual and philosophical grounds. In a 1951 essay, "Must We Burn Sade," Simone de Beauvoir identifies Sade as a forerunner of Freud with an intuitive grasp of the nature of the human heart:

"It is remarkable, for example, that in 1795 Sade wrote: ‘Sexual pleasure is, I agree, a passion to which all others are subordinate but in which they all unite.’ Not only does Sade, in the first part of this text, anticipate what has been called the ‘pansexuality’ of Freud, but also he makes eroticism the mainspring of human behavior. In addition, he asserts ... that sexuality is charged with a significance that goes beyond it. Libido is everywhere, and it is always far more than itself. Sade certainly anticipated this great truth. He knew that the ‘perversions’ that are vulgarly regarded as moral monstrosities or physiological defects actually envelop what would now be called an intentionality. He understood, too, that our tastes are motivated not by the intrinsic qualities of the object but by the latter’s relationship with the subject. In a passage in La Nouvelle Justine he tries to explain coprophilia. His reply is faltering, but clumsily using the notion of imagination, he points out that the truth of a thing lies not in what it is but in the meaning it has taken on for us in the course of our individual experience. Intuitions such as these allow us to hail Sade as a precursor of psychoanalysis."

It is precisely these perversions, Sade’s fascination with and understanding of the underbelly of the human psyche, that author Thomas Moore further dissects in his treatment of Sade’s works, Dark Eros: The Imagination of Sadism. While no apologist for Sade’s personal behavior, Moore defends the Marquis’ literature from a psychoanalytical point of view, making the point that, for just as there is inherent value to understanding and encouraging humanity’s nobler impulses, there is equal value to understanding, and perhaps on some level encouraging, the darker tendencies of the psyche:

"The foul atmosphere that surrounds him (Sade) is like the sulfuric stench of the devil. It would be a travesty of hell to smell roses when Satan appears. My purpose, then, in turning to Sade is to find a darkening of consciousness, to seek out a foul-smelling imagery appropriate for the amplification of those dreams and fantasies and art pieces that reveal an underworld aesthetic and a shadowy psychological reality."

Foul-smelling imagery abounds in the literary world of the Marquis de Sade. Moore has a treasure of perverted depictions of interactions between human beings, as well as between individuals and their own selves. Perverted is used here not to describe something that is perverse or wicked, but rather an opposite image, a deed that by its nature is diametrically in conflict with the norms and mores of polite society. For instance, Moore remarks on how Sade "perverts"’ society’s traditional image of Love. For most, Love is the one ideal emotion, or state of being. It is placed on a pedestal and revered as the universal aspiration for all humanity. And while there are many forms of Love, it has often been homogenized for commercial purposes; its image is aggrandized, and even trivialized in pop culture by songs, TV programs, and greeting cards. The net result is the creation of the myth of Love as sweet, Love as painless, Love as cheap and available on any TV set, in any record or Hallmark store.

In his works, Sade sets forth to turn this very notion on its head. To the Sadeian mind, Love is most often unavailable, is bitter, and is acquired only after painful struggle. The Sadeian notion of Love is something that cannot be acquired until one gains full knowledge of the self, and this in turn cannot be acquired until one is willing to come face-to-face with all of the horrifying images and realities we have stored within us. Sadeian Love is the pursuit of Eros, the Greek god of love, that for which our soul longs to join, that which provides the soul with inspiration and desire. While for most such inspirations include the desire to be financially secure, to succeed in a chosen professional field, to be a good parent and spouse, Moore postulates that there is validity to Sade’s point, that there are always to sides to every coin: “At first it may seem odd to claim that the sickening and frightening issues Sade presents have anything to do with desire, but that is the value of his approach- to unveil the stirrings of love in places that seem void of it.”

In all, Sade’s point is that, for all the splendor and bliss associated with Love, there is also pain, emptiness, and longing, the value of which is equal to that which society claims to be desirable of love in the first place. To Sade, these are worthless unless and until we are ready to accept and experience Love’s ugly sides too: “Although love can be creative, it is also destructive and entropic. If most literature focuses on the pleasures and pains of love, Sade turns our attention to its dark objects.” The darkest of these objects is fecal excrement, which Sade advocates that we consume with relish (no pun intended), writing, “No habit is more easily acquired than mard (excrement)-savoring; eat one, delicious, eat another, no two taste exactly alike, but all are subtle and the effect is somewhat that of an olive.”

The literal image Sade evokes is one more reprehensible than perhaps any other in the history of literature. However, it in the interpretation of Sade’s ludicrous proposition that Moore sees deeper meaning. Eating feces represents the figurative extreme, the furthest end of the spectrum of human behavior from that end which represents the height of ecstasy and self-fulfillment. In short, true freedom, the ability to be fully one’s self, cannot be experienced until one has the courage to both acknowledge and suffer that for which is the worst possible circumstance for that person, to travel to both ends of that spectrum and experience both equally. As Moore writes, “Love has its excremental component, and this, along with the more wholesome diet, has to be consumed.”

For Moore, what Sade’s work ultimately brings to light is the "shadow self" that exists within each individual. This part of the self is consigned to the shadows of our own being by forces and rules from without. Motivated by the fear that our true nature will be rejected by broader society, we force our very being to conform to expectations not of its making. Despite its pariah status, this side of the self strives to find an outlet for expression, to be granted legitimacy in a polite setting where this cannot be granted. That these impulses form our shadow, darker half becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: if the expectation is that these parts of our very selves are bad, that is how we ourselves will come to view them, and how they themselves will find expression.

Herman Hesse, the German author and contemporary of psychological pioneer Carl Jung, made this the theme of his celebrated novel Demian, wherein the young protagonist experiences the awakening of his own psyche and the requisite breach this causes with his familiar childhood world:

"The realms of day and night, two different worlds coming from two different opposite poles, mingled during this time. My parents’ house made up one realm, yet its boundaries were even narrower, actually embracing only my parents themselves ... It was a realm of brilliance, clarity, and cleanliness, gentle conversations, washed hands, clean clothes, and good manners. The other realm ... was completely different; it smelled different, spoke a different language, and promised and demanded different things. All these wild and cruel, attractive and hideous things surrounded us, could be found in the next alley, the next house. Policemen and tramps, drunkards who beat their wives, droves of young girls pouring out of the factories at night -- everywhere this second vigorous world erupted and gave off its scent, everywhere, that is, except in our parents’ rooms. For the time being I was not so much afraid of what would happen tomorrow as of the horrible certainty that my way, from now on, would lead farther and farther downhill into darkness. I felt acutely that new offenses were bound to grow out of this one offense, that my presence among my sisters, greeting and kissing my parents, were a lie, that I was living a lie concealed deep inside myself."

The struggle for the true self to find legitimate standing and expression in a hostile, judgmental world is echoed in works as diverse as George Orwell’s 1984, Billy Joel’s The Stranger and Jethro Tull’s Aqualung. Sade, Freud, Jung, Hesse, Moore, and others are of a school of thought that emphasizes the importance of granting our "other," darker half equal standing as a part of ourselves.

An important criticism of Sade is that he, in order to make his point, took this premise to the extreme. In doing so, he overemphasized one aspect of the self to the exclusion of providing a deeper understanding of the whole self. The human psyche is neither totally shadow nor totally enlightened, but rather exists within a plain wherein both halves intermingle to the extent that, for the undisciplined soul, it may grow increasingly difficult to determine where within this union the true self exists.

Sade as messenger casts a pall on the legitimate contributions his writings have otherwise helped to make in our collective search to know and understand the self, the psyche. In this sense, Sade leaves a legacy both brutal and sublime. He is an enigma for the ages: he was, on the one hand, a man of heightened self-importance and brutal sexual temperament; simultaneously, he was a man passionately dedicated to the defense of the individual, and possessed of a keen understanding of the complexities of the human psyche, the labyrinth of the human heart. The riddle of how to treat the memory of such a man shall resonate through the ages: if we cannot burn Sade, must we then celebrate him?

Copyright 1999, Dark Horse Multimedia Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.crimelibrary.com/classics/marquis/

 

General Reading

At Home with the Marquis de Sade, Francine du Plessix Gray, Chatto and Windus, 1998.

The Marquis de Sade - A Life, Neil Schaeffer, Hamish Hamilton, 1999.

The Marquis de Sade, A Biography and Note of Hope, Robert del Quiaro, Messidor Books, 1994.


Performance in Online Cybersexual Addiction Indicators - My Behaviour at That Time

 

I have carried out the following indicator activities of cybersexual addiction, recalling the situation, over the period. I completed them as conservatively as was possible and, also, since I am single, some of them were inapplicable to me. Would this have made a difference, or not? Who can say?

 

The OSA-Q was developed to help people to identify if they might be having a problem with their online sexual behaviour. The OSA-Q is a 24-item questionnaire that was developed based on signs and symptoms of sexual addiction and how they might appear in relation to online sexual behaviour. It is important to note that the questionnaire is not a psychological test; it has not been researched and its psychometric properties are currently unknown (i.e., reliability and validity). At the present time the OSA-Q is only a self-exploration tool. Individuals who use the OSA-Q that think they have a problem with sexual addiction are referred to seek a state licensed psychotherapist who specializes in the treatment of sexual problems.

The reader may consult the website for the actual definitions of the 6 areas which are used as descriptors. This is my performance; the higher the percentage, the more dysfunctional the situation:

Life Interference - 75%
Social Withdrawal - 100%
Obsessive-Compulsive Behaviour - 60%
Tolerance / Withdrawal - 80%
Emotional Distress - 25%
Destructive Impairment - 71%

Online Sexual Addiction
http://onlinesexaddict.org/osaq.html

In the second case, the process is a little different, depending on similar areas, but giving a more global view:

If 1-3 of these symptoms are found to be true, this may be an area of concern and should be openly discussed with a friend or family member. More than 3 positive answers would indicate the need to consider more professional counseling with someone trained in the treatment of addictive disorders and consideration of a 12 step support program like those listed in resources for sexual addicts.

My score was 8, (possibly more, because of lack of partner).

Sexual Recovery Institute
http://www.sexualrecovery.com/sri_docs/cyber.htm


Extracts From My Recent Psychosexual Report

 

Clearly, the contents of this report are 'Private and Confidential', but, since I have no fear of disclosure, I am happy to offer some portions. I am not selecting the extracts because they support my arguments; that will have no sway in court.

I offer this, so that readers may see the structure of the report and focus on some of the issues which have arisen, on this site, and their contemporary context:

The report is nine pages long, A4 and single spaced. Following a formal description of the legal request issues etc, these are the sections:

Presenting Complaint

The patient knew why he was seeing me, namely, for me to prepare a Medical/Psychosexual Report re. his impeding sentence for downloading obscene material from the Internet.

Patient Occupation

Family History

Schooling

Medical History

Premorbid Personality

He is not a perfectionist but he said that he is very good at organising people to do things. I suppose this was essential for his scientific PhD. He likes things settled and dealt with but then he will leave things for quite a time and neglect them. He said in many ways he is a paradoxical person.

Hobbies and Sport

He is a semi-professional musician, he also learned karate. He is generally a good all round person with lots of interests.

Psychosexual History

Much of this is covered in my statement elsewhere.

Physical

He is a powerful man, made good eye contact and is obviously highly intelligent. As Dr xxxxxx reported, I also found no obvious evidence of cognitive disorder.

I did not perform a physical examination, but I arranged an endocrinological assessment to measure his gonadotrophins and sex hormones as a baseline. These are within normal limits.

Opinion

As the internet is a relatively new phenomenon, classification of people with associated problems has not yet been fully described the sexological or psychological/psychiatric literature. However, psychological factors cited for such misuse of the internet for sexual purposes include:

1. Depression, specifically hypomania.

2. Compulsive disorders, compared to gambling or eating disorders.

3. Anxiety and stress relief, offering an escape into fantasy.

4. A sexual dysfunction, such as erectile impotence, whihc makes sexual intercourse difficult or impossible.

5. Lack of social skills to form relationships.

Certainly factors 1 to 4 do have some relevance to Mr xxxxxx.

 

The Triple A engine is a term that refers to the internet as offering three factors at the core of its effect on some vulnerable people, namely Accessibility, Affordability and Anonymity, (the last as believed by the user). In ones own home almost any type or variety of sexual material can be viewed, often there is no direct cost involved, although users can pay to join specific groups to receive regular material, Usually this behaviour is anonymous, but if apprehended modern techniques enable such downloading to be traced.

Studies show that most normal men and women do not view the type of material involved here, such as hard pornography involving children, animals or violence. There is a psychological fit whereby the user unconsciously matches his own psychological profile to what he looks for. For most men and women who use cybersex for gratification through masturbation, adult soft porn sites are the most commonly visited, whereas less than 5% (5% of all cybersexual computer users is how many?) visit sites depicting violence and abuse of children (this could be because it is heavily illegal, carries inordinate penalties, is in the realms of the ultimate taboos and is relatively difficult to do - also, how do they know this, exactly?).

The most vulnerable people are those who do have paraphilic urges, but in past times have been able to control them. With access to the internet, The Triple A engine is too much for them and they cannot resist their urges, especially if they are undergoing g a period of stress, depression or anxiety. Furthermore, such users, often experience rapid habituation and a flattening of response to the material viewed so that the nature and frequency of use has to increase to maintain their arousal levels. Salience occurs when the patient (?) spends an increasing amount of time thinking and fantasising about the internet, as well as spending inordinate amounts of time using it, often to the detriment of family life and work.

Certainly many of these factors apply here. Mr xxxxx, a highly intelligent man with a good if not somewhat hypersexual libido, coupled with erectile anxieties, has experienced periods of great stress in his life, particularly at his mother's death and the time that xxxxxx left him, as well as the insurmountable problems he experienced as head of his teaching department. He developed an adjustment disorder with consequent depressive illness, for which he takes Prozac.

Without the internet Mr xxxxxx would probably not have taken the path he has, but because of his expertise in using it for his academic research, the Triple A engine and the emotional problems mentioned above, he was unable to resist and has travelled far down this road.

Is he a paraphiliac? This refers to people who find relationships with a partner, hetero or homosexual, inadequate and require sex that involves children, animals or objects, (fetishism), which may involve the inflicting or receiving of pain, or even murder, and other such activities. Certainly Mr xxxxxx has never, as far as I know, acted out any of these fantasies, and indeed he has said that he would be appalled if he felt the need to, stating that he would rather end his life rather than go along those paths.

Studies have shown that some individuals who exhibit the more dangerous side of paraphilia, there may be some history of brain damage sustained while the individual was developing in the uterus or at birth by say a difficult forceps delivery. It has been suggested that when this happens different areas of the brain which are not usually associated, may become joined in some way, so that for example the sexual arousal centre may link with the areas that control aggression. A history of head injury may also be relevant. I note here that, although Mr xxxxxx cannot recall details of his birth, none of these factors see to apply (this has now been confirmed by relatives). I note that his sex-hormone profile is normal which excludes problems in that area, but it does not rule out other causes for the potency problems that he has experienced intermittently in his life. In addition he does not exhibit behaviour that are overtly paraphilic, as he has never acted out his fantasies.

He continues to deny the fact that by looking at such abuse he indirectly condones it, and therefore contributes indirectly to its dissemination. He argues that it is there anyway, and he only samples what is there. He is very firm in his belief.

Is he dangerous? The factors usually cited in considering this in a patient are:

1. History of criminality or history of sociopathy. The patient has no such background, There are no reported previous convictions.

2. A history of violence, both sexual and non-sexual against children. There is no record of this.

3. Associated alcohol or drug misuse. Not present here.

4. Single men fixated on children. He has had many heterosexual partners but has never involved children of any age.

5. Paraphilic interests. He has certainly looked at various form of sexuality in fantasy and has been aroused by them, but has never, to my knowledge, acted them out.

6 Most worryingly, however, is his recent trip to xxxxxx. If he intended to photograph young children for sexual/voyeuristic purposes, then this might suggest that he is physically involving the outside world, beyond his Internet behaviours, in his fantasies. He said that he did know why he did this, Was it a desire to be apprehended? A plea for help? One cannot really know.

Only number 6 of he above see to apply to Mr xxxxxx, which makes sit difficult to assess his possible dangerousness. Certainly in the seven week period his use of the internet involved more disturbing and violent material, almost as if he was losing control of what he watched and what he needed for sexual arousal.

I find it difficult to classify the patient. According to the definitions of say DSM 4, he is not a paraphilic, because he does not feel recurrent strong urges to act out those deviant behaviours in reality, although if his visit to xxxxxx was to obtain photographs of children this may not be so. He does have empathy with people, expically children who are abused, but to him this is totally separate from his sexual fantasies. He cannot equate the screen images with the fact that real people, specifically children, are being abused. To him they are merely images. Most people would look in horror and revulsion at what he downloads, as they would equate the images with the actual people depicted. It is as if Mr xxxxxx has the wrong sort of empathy, as he cannot comprehend this point of view (I can comprehend it all, it just does not apply to me). Specifically, what he maintains are essentially private fantasies are in fact provided by the suffering of others, even though he has no hand in producing these images (everyone in the 'first-world' enjoys the life they live from the suffering of others, worldwide, such it was and always will be). I do agree, however, that philosophically this is a moot point, as ones fantasies tend to be totally private, but in this case the internet has magnified and exploded his fantasies, although he steadfastly refuses to accept any linkage between them and reality.

In Sum

My diagnosis would be that Mr xxxxxx had developed an Internet compulsion with paraphilic elements, such as voyeurism and sadomasochism, but without the desire to act them out. Associated with this was an abnormal type of empathy response to the material of his fantasies. I cannot easily assess his degree of dangerousness as it is outside my area of expertise.

Treatment

I make the following suggestions for any proposed treatment program (my comments):

1. Aim to make him understand the Triple A engine (Accessibility, Affordability and Anonymity). Identifying his particular triggers, such as depression, boredom, anxiety etc that make him move to the internet as solace.

Yes, I fully understand the The Engine; I have lived it for many years.

2. Explore his empathy. Look at the children (bear in mind, this was only one paraphilia of interest) who are exploited (the majority of pictures on my machine were 'erotic', not 'abusive') to fuel his fantasies. Address issue of denial.

Empathy is the ability to perceive others' perspectives and to recognise and respond in a compassionate way to the feelings of others. Empathy flows from emotional awareness, but an individual cannot relate fully to others until she or he recognises their own emotions.

They must be able to identify feelings, recognise their feelings, and then relate those feelings to other people.

Assessing Men Who Sexually Abuse - A Practice Guide (Chapter Nine), D, Briggs, P. Doyle, T. Gooch and R. Kennigton, Jessica Kingsley, 1999.

Irony waves its cheeky bottom, back and forth, throughout this story. Not only have I attended extensive courses in client-centered counselling and human relations, but my final promotion to Head of Department, in the educational sector, would have been impossible (particularly in these days), if I did not have a secure record of being empathetic and sympathetic, and be able to balance these with appropriate professional detachment.

Indeed, it was empathy (actually, a high degree of emotional intelligence), which led to my final episode. I was not willing to accept the offence caused to me, my colleagues and to many of the children. If you know me, you will know that to be true, in and outside employment, if not, so be it.

It was, in fact, a deficit of professional detachment, not lack of empathy, which has placed me where I am today ...

... and that is OK, because I would rather be where I am (human and honest), than be where they wanted me to be (detached and manipulative) - so it goes.

Let Us Speak Of Your Empathy

Your bleeding-heart, breast and dribbling eyes,
A cosy sensation to feed all your lies.

You sit there and nod and say that it's bad,
But how many minutes to lose all that is sad?

A shake and a tut when the blood starts to flow,
As the painful truth rises, you do not want to know.

You sit in your house, wear your clothes that came cheap,
Enjoying the suffering, as young children weep.

Their day-long toil lives, of hunger and greed.
You ignore what is stated and continue to feed.

And just down your street, behind doors painted bright.
Your neighbours beat children and worse in the night.

You smile through your windows at everything clean.
Your fear, hate and loathing maintain your false sheen.

So don't get so mighty and high on your throne,
Before – ask me my thoughts and what I have known.

And as for your feeling of deep empathy,
Just accept the truth – it's for you, not for 'me'.

Written or obtained when in prison. WebManager 2003

From Here to Empathy

Summary: We risk becoming inured to tragedy, veering from empathy to callousness.

We get an abundance of data from the media that can have profound impact on our emotions. Daily we learn of tragedies of war and see images of them. There is no question that the news can be unutterably sad.

But the danger is that our emotions may get polarized; we may feel great grief and hopelessness about mankind, because we hear so much of the bad news. We risk becoming inured to tragedy, veering from empathy to callousness. And that can contaminate every domain of our experience, until we feel hopeless about everything.

The problem arises because it is so painful to feel excess pity. What we want is to be sensitive without falling into the dichotomy and clinging to one of those two poles. We can’t simply shut off the news, although some do that. We need to take in the information. We need to be able to handle the news. So we aspire to more than shutting off.

We’re after the elegant solution, emotional modulation. The inelegant solution is to feel morose, hurt, defeated and over-pitying. The other extreme of inelegant solution is to become callous and indifferent to the suffering of others. The danger of the inelegant solution is that it overgeneralizes: You start feeling more callous about friends, loved ones, everything.

The goal is to develop a sense of empathy and maintain it. I like to think of empathy as a system of vicarious learning that has evolved to protect us. Our friends, family members, kin are suffering, and we identify with them.

For emotional health, the ideal is to uproot overpity and callousness and to tune into sensitivity, or empathy. Empathy is the ability to experience a situation vicariously without overgeneralizing but also without dismissing it as irrelevant to your life. It is difficult to extricate the abundance of data we get from the media from the data we get from family members, and others relevant to us, without shutting the inflow down.

This is critically important for those who are subject to depression, because they especially need to learn how to modulate their emotions. Modulation requires awareness of one’s own emotional experience. It requires expansion of our emotional lexicon, distinguishing sensitivity from oversensitivity.

Empathy is an emotion that is essential for social life. Lack of empathy alienates others. When you’re unempathetic, it’s hard to understand what someone else is feeling and impossible to display kindness. Understanding and kindness are two key ingredients in social relations. Empathy not only underlies social relations; it is critical to self-regulation.

It is important to resist feeling helpless and hopeless on the one hand, and callous and indifferent on the other, thinking the world is a terrible place. Neither is good for understanding others or ourselves. Empathy clears the way for taking in information, allowing you to create more options for yourself.

How to develop empathy?

• First, identify in yourself the tendency to veer from one extreme to the other, from hopelessness and helplessness to being indifferent. This is the tendency to overgeneralize.

• Then, struggle to figure out what you are telling yourself. We all have inner dialogues with ourselves, and these provide us with the opportunity to insert some control over our mental life. These allow us needed awareness of our mental processes.

For example, one line of self-talk may be, “I can’t do anything about it; so I don’t care.” Or, conversely, “This is too unfathomably horrible, I can’t stand living in such a world.”

• By using what you are telling yourself, figure out the underlying philosophies you have about the world. These philosophies may be implicit, in that you may not realize you have a belief that the world is a Horrible Place. Nevertheless, such beliefs lead directly to demoralization and depression. We all have implicit philosophies, and they drive how we handle ourselves emotionally.

A more realistic philosophy and self-conversation might be, “This news is quite sad. I don’t know that I can affect the outcome. But I certainly feel saddened without lapsing into hopelessness or passivity.”

• Cultivate empathy. It requires some work. It’s not just a willful immediate choice; it’s a long-range choice, like learning a foreign language or learning to drive a stick shift. You cultivate empathy by recognizing that when another person is hurt, so are you. You learn to identify in yourself that same feeling.

Putting in the effort to cultivate empathy runs counter to some strains of our culture. We live in a culture of entitlement, and are often exhorted to feel we have self-worth without making ourselves worthy. We believe we are entitled to feel good about ourselves all the time. Educating ourselves is a process that never ends. So we need to accept the habit of mind of working on ourselves.

•In cultivating healthy habits of mind, stupidity is a good thing. Identifying one’s own stupidity is not a cause for concern but a cause for celebration. The trick is to apply the label not to yourself but to thoughts or behaviors. Noticing your own stupidity is where learning begins.

Nando Pelusi, Feb 6, 2004, http://www.psychologytoday.com/htdocs/prod/PTOArticle/pto-20040206-000003.asp

One form of distorted thinking which has received particular attention by those who work with sexual abusers is that of denial. Denial here is considered to part of a multi-faceted phenomenon which reflects a desire on the part of the perpetrator to avoid acknowledgement of the details and ramifications of offending behaviour. In that sense it shares a substrate with other thinking errors.

Denial is manifest in various ways. Denial of abuse having occurred, denial of having 'perpetrated' abuse, denial of full or part responsibly for commision of abusive acts, denial of harm to victim during abuse, denial of the likelihood of further abuse occurring, and denial of the impact of abuse on significant others are the main issues.

Chaffin (1997) reminds us to be cautious in distinguishiung 'denial' (a psychological defence mechanism) from lying (a social behaviour) and from being mistaken or misguided (a human frailty). 'Lying is often motivated by fear of the consequences, particularly short term consequences, whereas denial might be thought of as motivated by a need to maintain a favourable image of self or important others or by fear of overwhelming aversive emotion.'

Assessing Men Who Sexually Abuse - A Practice Guide (Chapter Seven), D, Briggs, P. Doyle, T. Gooch and R. Kennigton, Jessica Kingsley, 1999.

Well, all I can say here is, if I wanted to 'maintain a favourable image of self or important others or by fear of overwhelming aversive emotion', I would hardly be acting, or communicating, as I am at the moment. Denial would help my case, at this time (indeed, it is my belief, this is why many men show signs of regret, remorse and shame, when caught in Operations such as 'Ore' etc. - that is what a 'normal' person would be expected to do - they are denying the enjoyment that they had; there are many other emotions which direct their responses, as well).

I refuse to compromise my morality, knowledge and beliefs on this issue. What I emanate is not denial - it is called 'being honest', and I know that is difficult to recognise, in this day and age; that cannot be denied.

3. Combat his loneliness, perhaps by encouraging appropriate relationships.

Well, I have many close friends and close family members, and thank goodness that I do. But, as many of us know, the loneliest place can often be in a crowd. However, if you are going to finance dating agency fees, I am up for it.

4. Therapies designed to control his Internet addiction, such as putting a censor on the sort of material he can see and download, such as is used top render it safe for children to use, may be of help. If possible, a random sample of what he does watch or download can be sampled by another person in a supervisory capacity.

Well, since The Addiction is debatable, I am open to discussion on this topic. As for restricting my access, there are so many reasons why this is pointless.

However, more importantly to me (and to others i.e. you), is it will restrict my freedom of expression, freedom to access information, infringement of my privacy and, as a knowledge worker, restricts my access to fulfilling employment. I will go as far as I can on Human Rights Issues to fight this one; only time will tell.

Also, for the record, why are they able to destroy my PC at all? and, if they want to destroy the data, why can they not just remove the hard-drive and return the perfectly good PC for my legal use?

It's like destroying all the long overcoats belonging to a shoplifter.

5. Concurrent treatment for his anxiety and depression, by counselling and/or appropriate antidepressant medication.

No problem there - please carry on!

6. Let him understand the need for alertness and to be aware of the seductiveness of his drifting back into his behaviours in question.

Well, since the only 'behaviours in question' are the downloading and storage of certain types of pictures, rest assured, I will never be that stupid again (or I might move to the USA or Canada - that's a joke, by-the-way).

Whether Mr xxxxxx should receive this kind of help under strict supervision in the community, or in a prison milieu, is also outside my area of expertise.

To be honest, The Good Doctor, in such cases, it is outside the expertise of anyone at the moment, only within their job description.

References

Dr xxxxxx

Consultant in Psychosexual Medicine

This gentleman is the only person I have talked to, at this time, who has any real awareness of the sexual issues under discussion. I accept his clinical diagnosis, with the reservations indicated, within the extensive knowledge base of the subject which he has. If The Good Doctor is reading this, you are a superb representative of the profession and you deserve a wider hearing.

However, because of the nature of my situation, I am compelled to have commented on the suggested 'treatment'. This is not a reflection on the skills and judgement of The Good Doctor (far from it); it is adding the dimension which is still not present in (almost) all the expert's spheres of understanding i.e. that of the passive user.


Repulsion is the sentry that guards the gate to all that we most desire.

Salvedor Dali


Finally, a few glorious words of wisdom and understanding (my emphasis):

This point leads Laing to propose something very like a lacuna, a mental device "that operates on our experience of operations" so as to cancel them from experience. This goes on in such a way that we have no awareness either of the operations that extinguish aspects of our experiences or the secondary operations that shut out the first. The whole goes on behind a mental screen, hushed whispers of thoughts disappearing into silence. We can only notice this gap in experience when some later event faces us with it.

The novelist Leslie Epstein captures the dilemma well. He spent a year at the YIVO, an institute for Jewish research, reading about the Holocaust for his book, King of the Jews. With some candor he later recounted (25):

"Some years ago I wrote a brief account of this period of research and called it a "heart-stopping experience." What rubbish! The most frightening aspect about the year was the way my heart pumped merrily along, essentially undeflected by these stories of endless woe. I think I must have sensed soon after I arrived at the library that if I were to get through such material at all, to say nothing about being able to think about it and shape it. I would have to draw a psychic shutter, thick as iron, between myself and the accounts of the fate of the Jews. Thus I sat through the winter, wrapped in my overcoat - it's not just noisy at YIVO, it's chilly too - calmly and callously reading."

Epstein confesses his secret, that he was untouched by these tales of woe. How could he have come to his casual callousness? He must have sensed the need, he deduces, to draw a protective psychic shutter. There is no report of the moment that iron shutter fell, no record of its clank. Most certainly there is no recall of the moment it fell. The act of repression, it seems, is repressed along with what it represses.

But Epstein's repression was at best a half-successful strategy. Epstein felt guilty of his lack of guilty feelings. As he sat reading callously, he thought "I'm going to be punished for this. I'm going to have nightmares." But they did not come. Instead there was a curious twist of feeling. One sign was that his book about the Holocaust flowed from his pen in such jaunty tones that in enraged some readers. Another was a muting of feelings in general:(26)

"What I noticed first was a lack of responsiveness not so much to the horrors of the past but to those occurring around me. John Lennon murdered, a Pope and a President wounded: I shrugged it off with at best a flicker of interest in social pathology. The earth quaked, mountains blew up, hostages were taken, and, worse, friends and colleagues suffered the knocks, the vicissitudes, of life. What I did - liked the cursed Trigorin in Chekov's The Sea Gull - was take a series of notes. The world was stale, flat ... it was not only the calamities of the day that rolled off my duck's back like water, it was all manner of pleasures as well."

Epstein realizes that he has played what he calls "an ironical trick" on himself: "It was as if I had made a pact wish my emotions not to feel, not to respond, but had forgotten to set a date at which the arrangement would end." But the unfelt emotions nevertheless insinuated themselves into his writing and were displaced into his other novel. The second manuscript, he realized one day, was full of pain and death, amputations and torture. The horror he had insulated himself against and kept from his book on the Holocaust had moved to a novel set in California. "Instantly, I realized," writes Epstein (27), "that all the horror I had kept from the pages of my Holocaust novel was now returning as if in a reflex of revenge. The thousands of missing corpses were pressing round ... one thinks of a compact gone awry, a bargain whose deepest meaning is never grasped by the bargainer, a version of 'The Sorcerer's Apprentice' in which the very powers sought for - to animate, to imagine, to control - become the source, through sheer repetition, of one's own destruction."

"The compact gone awry" is an apt phrase for repression. The trade-off is of a diminished attention in exchange for lessened anxiety - in this case, muted emotions allow a casual contemplation of horrible facts. There is a price, though, for striking such a bargain. What's more, it doesn't work so well: the repressed fear and loathing leak out in disguise, blemishing innocent thoughts.

How did Epstein learn so well to mute emotions? Did repression first come to him in the cold, noisy halls of YIVO? Not if we are to belive Epstein's own inner detective work:(28) "The emotional censorship I practiced at YIVO could not by itself account for this large-scale return of what I believe is called the repressed. When, at what other time, had I purposefully tuned my back on my feelings? ... When my father died, thirty years ago, my brother and I did not go to the funeral." Instead, Epstein and his brother were taken to see The Lavender Hill Mob and then to a museum with a full replica of the Spirit of St. Louis. Fun covered over the boys' misery.

According to Freud, the penalty for repression is repetition. Painful experiences not dealt with are, unconsciously, repeated. We do not quite realize that we are repeating ourselves, because the very diversionary schemas we are repeating keep the fact of their repetition from awareness. On the other hand, we forget we have done this before and, on the the other, do not quite realize what we are doing again. The self-deception is complete.

Daniel Goleman, Vital Lies, Simple Truths -The Psychology of Self-Deception; Secrets We Keep From Ourselves, Bloomsbury, 1998.

Consider Allen Wheelis's 1966 parable, The Illusionless Man.(8) The story begins:

"Once upon a time there was a man who had no illusions about anything. While still in the crib he had learned that his mother was not always kind; at two he had given up fairies; witches and hobgoblins disappeared from his world at three; at four he knew that rabbits lay no eggs; and at five, on a cold night in December, with a bitter little smile, he said good-by to Santa Claus. At six when he started school illusions flew from his life like feathers in a windstorm: he discovered that his father was not always brave or even honest, that presidents are little men, that the Queen of England goes to the bathroom like everybody else, and that his first grade teacher, a pretty round-faced woman with dimples, did not know much of anything ... As a young man he realized that the most generous act is self-serving, the most disinterested enquiry serves interest, that lies are told by printed words. Of all those people who lose illusions he lost more than anyone else, taboo and prescription alike; and as everything became permitted nothing was left worthwhile."

Wheelis's hero marries a woman who is full of illusion. As they are to be wed, he tells her:

"God won't be there, honey; the women will be weeping for their own lost youth and innocence, the men wanting to have you in bed; and the priest standing slightly above us will be looking down your cleavage as his mouth goes dry ... "

By the tale's end, Henry - the illusionless man - and his wife, Lorabelle, are elderly. By then Henry has seen that illusion lends both comfort and meaning to life.

" ... he could see himself striving toward a condition of beauty or truth or goodness or love that did not exist, but whereas earlier in his life he had always said, "It's an illusion," an turned away, now he said "There isn't anything else," and stayed with it ... And when it came time to die Lorabelle said, "Now we'll never be parted," and Henry smiled and kissed her and said to himself, "There isn't anything else," and they died.

Daniel Goleman, Vital Lies, Simple Truths -The Psychology of Self-Deception; Vital Lies and Simple Truths, Bloomsbury, 1998.

Somewhere between the two poles - living a life of vital lies and speaking simple truths - there lies a skillful mean, a path to sanity and survival.

Daniel Goleman, Vital Lies, Simple Truths -The Psychology of Self-Deception; Vital Lies and Simple Truths, Bloomsbury, 1998.


Sentencing and Incarceration

This section is graphic intensive. All graphics are deemed to be decent, in UK law, by my judgement, or by the fact that they appeared in the UK press which has no age restriction for purchase.


Registration, On Licence, as a Sex Offender

On release, once again, I had to register as a Sex Offender. My modified, Sex Offender registration documents are here.

My modified, Sex Offender licence documents are here.


The Day I Became Officially Unsuitable

department for education and skills,
creating opportunity, releasing potential, achieving excellence.

Mowden Hall,
Staindrop Road,
Darlington DL3 9BG.

PRIVATE AND IN CONFIDENCE WebManager

Prisoner Number JF8463

tel: 0870 0012345 fax: 01325 392695 info@dfes.gsi.gov.uk www.dfes.gov.uk

Direct line: 01325 392112 Local fax: 01325 392178

Our Ref: RP84/45844, 3rd July 2003

Dear WebManager,

The Secretary of State has been informed that on 5 December 2002, at Sheffield Crown Court, you were convicted of 20 counts of Making Indecent Photographs or Pseudo-Photographs of a Child, contrary to section 1(1)(a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978.

As a result of your conviction, the Secretary of State is required, under section 142 of the Education Act 2002, to make a direction prohibiting you from carrying out work to which section 142 applies, on the grounds that you are unsuitable to work with children. A copy of the direction is enclosed.

The effect of this decision is that, in addition to being prohibited from carrying out work to which section 142 applies, you are also disqualified from working with children in accordance with Section 35 of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000. This means that you will commit an offence if, while you are disqualified, you knowingly apply for, offer to do, accept, or do any work in a "regulated position" as specified in Section 36 of that Act. In this context work could include paid or unpaid activity in the public, private, voluntary, and volunteering sectors.

Others will commit an offence if, knowing that you are disqualified, they offer you work in a regulated position, or procure work in a regulated position for you, or allow you to continue working in a regulated position.

Your name, Departmental reference number, National Insurance number and date of birth will be included in the list of persons determined by the Secretary of State to be unsuitable for employment to which section 142 applies (List 99). Local education authorities and other bodies concerned with the employment of teachers or childcare workers can make checks to find out whether a person applying to work with children is on the List.

The Secretary of State's decision also means that you are no longer eligible to be registered by the General Teaching Council and we have written to the Council instructing it to remove your name from it's register.

You cannot appeal against this Direction because the statutory regulations require the Secretary of State to bar you as a direct result of the conviction mentioned above. However, if you successfully appeal against that conviction you should inform me straight away so that I can arrange to revoke the Direction.

You can also seek a review of your disqualification from working with children on grounds of a material change in your circumstances, but you must wait ten years from the date of this letter before you can do that, and a review on those grounds would be conducted by the Care Standards Tribunal.

If at any time you are considering applying for, or undertaking, any paid or voluntary activity that may include regular contact with children, or unsupervised access to children, I would strongly advise that you seek professional legal advice about the possible implications of that in relation to your disqualification.

Further information about the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act can be found on the internet at http://www.homeoffice.gav.uk/cpg/cmcsbill.htm

Yours sincerely,

xxxxx

Assistant Casework Manager PSIS Division

INVESTOR IN PEOPLE
 

 

 

EDUCATION ACT 2002

DIRECTION

In pursuance of section 142 of the Education Act 2002, the Secretary of State for Education and Skills hereby directs that WebManager, on the grounds that WebManager is unsuitable to work with children, may not carry out work to which this section applies. A relevant employer shall not use WebManager to carry out any such work.

Paul Mackenley

On behalf of the Secretary of State for Education and Skills


Preventing Unsuitable People From Working With Children and Young People

Guidance for Education Staff: Revised May 2002

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOW OUT-OF-DATE (26/4/06)

 

Contents (Paragraphs)

What is the legal basis of the Secretary of State's powers? (1)
What can the Secretary of State do? (2-4)
What is `relevant employment'? (5-7)
What is the effect of a direction? (8-14)
Can the Secretary of State bar someone automatically? (15-18)
What other behaviour or medical conditions are likely to lead to barring? (19-24)
What is the purpose of barring? (25)
How is the Department informed of misconduct? (26)
How does the Department deal with cases? (27-29)
What should representations include? (30)
Medical reports (31-32)
Action following receipt of written representations (33-36)
When all relevant information has been received (37-39)
Informing the person's employer (40)
How long will the Department take to deal with a case? (41)
Can a bar or restriction be reviewed? (42-46)
Do people have to apply for a review? (47)
What should an application for review include? (48)
How does the Department deal with requests for reviews? (49-57)
Is there any appeal against a decision by the Secretary of State? (58-59)
What is List 99? (60)
Are cases dealt with in confidence? (61-62)
The role of the General Teaching Councils for England and Wales (63-66)
Disclosure of criminal record information (67-72)

Annex A: The definition of regulation positions contained in the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000

Annex B: List of criminal offences for purposes of exercise of Secretary of State's powers under regulation 9 (1) (a) (automatic barring)


Page 3

What is the legal basis of the Secretary of State's powers?

1. The Secretary of State's powers to bar or restrict a person's employment are set out in The Education (Restriction of Employment) Regulations 2000. This guidance aims to explain the effect of those regulations, but it must not be relied on as a definitive interpretation of the law - only a Court can provide that.

What can the Secretary of State do?

2. The Secretary of State can issue directions that are binding on employers, e.g. local education authorities, schools and further education establishments. A direction can:

a. require an employer to suspend or terminate a person's employment in relevant employment, or make the person's continued employment subject to specified conditions;

b. stipulate that a person cannot be appointed to, or employed in, relevant employment in future; or

c. stipulate that a person can only be appointed to, or employed in, relevant employment in future, subject to specified conditions.

3. She can issue a direction on any one of the following grounds:

a. on grounds of misconduct;

b. on grounds that a person is not a fit and proper person to be employed as a teacher or a worker with children under the age of 19;

c. on grounds that a person is included in the list kept by the Secretary of State for Health under Section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1999

(list of individuals considered unsuitable to work with children); or

d. on medical grounds.

4. The Secretary of State can issue a direction in respect of someone who is not in relevant employment at the time, or who never has been in relevant employment, to prevent the person taking up such work in the future.

What is `Relevant employment'?

5. 'Relevant employment' means:

a. any employment by a local education authority, or the proprietor of an independent school, as a teacher, or a worker with children or young persons under the age of 19;

b. employment by any other body as a teacher at a maintained school, a non-maintained special school, or a further education institution;

c. employment by a governing body of a maintained school, a non-maintained special school or further education institution as a worker with children or young persons under the age of 19.

6. It also includes people who provide their services as teachers in schools, but are not directly employed under a contract, such as supply teachers, and student teachers.

7. A worker with children or young persons is a person who is not a teacher, but whose work brings him or her into regular contact with persons under the age of 19.

This can include people such as classroom assistants, school caretakers, care workers in special or residential schools, or youth workers in the youth service.

What is the effect of a Direction?

8. A direction has the force of law. It takes effect as soon as it is made and remains in force until it is revoked by the Secretary of State, or by the Tribunal established under the Protection of Children Act to hear appeals (see paragraph 58).

The primary effect is that an employer must not employ someone in relevant employment in a way that would breach the terms of a direction. Other restrictions that apply regardless of the grounds on which the direction is made are:

a. a barred person cannot work as a volunteer, or as an employee of a contractor, in a school or a further education institution in a way that would breach the terms of the direction if he or she were employed by the school or institution, or a local education authority; and a barred person cannot serve as a school governor.

9. A direction does not prevent someone from being employed in work that is not relevant employment, for example, as a teacher in adult or higher education; in administrative work which does not bring the person into regular contact with children or young persons under the age of 19; or in any other work which falls outside the definition of relevant employment.

10. However, under the provisions of Part II of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000, anyone who is barred on the ground that he or she is not a fit and proper person to be employed as a teacher or worker with children or young persons, and anyone who is included permanently on the Protection of Children Act List, will also be disqualified from working with children.

11. A disqualified person will only be able to seek a review of his or her disqualification after a period of ten years has elapsed from the date of disqualification, or from his or her release from prison if that is later. The Act also provides that it will be a criminal offence for a disqualified person to apply for, offer to do, accept or do any work in any of the regulated positions set out in section 36 of the Act (see Annex A).

Any work in a regulated position is classified as working with children, including work in the following settings:

Page 5

a. institutions for the detention of children;

b. children's hospitals;

c. care homes, residential care homes, nursing homes, or private hospitals which are exclusively or mainly for children;

d. schools and sixth form colleges - this includes members of governing bodies;

e. children's homes or voluntary homes;

f. homes provided under section 82(5) of the Children Act 1989; and

g. local education authority maintained, private, or voluntary nurseries and playgroups, day care premises and creches.

12. Work is defined in the Act in very broad terms and is not confined to people who are in paid employment. For example, it also includes people in unpaid employment, people employed under contract, people undertaking work-experience and volunteers.

13. The Act also prohibits a disqualified person from:

a. supervising or managing people working in the above settings;

b. appointment as a local education authority chief education officer;

c. work, whose normal duties include caring for, training, supervising or being in sole charge of children; and

d. any work involving unsupervised contact with children under arrangements made in connection with the above settings, or made by parents, e.g. private or home tutors and sports coaches.

14. A person who is a member of the Teachers Pension Scheme is not eligible to apply for ill-health retirement benefits if he or she is barred on grounds of misconduct, or on the ground that he or she is not a fit and proper person to be employed as a teacher because of his or her behaviour. However, if a member of the scheme is barred on medical grounds, or on the ground that he or she is not a fit and proper person to be employed as a teacher because of a medical condition, he or she is still eligible to apply for those benefits.

Can the Secretary of State bar someone automatically?

15. Yes. There are two circumstances in which she must issue a direction barring someone from relevant employment automatically.

16. First, if she is notified that the person has been included permanently on the Protection of Children Act List.

17. Second, she must issue a direction on the grounds that a person is not a fit and proper person to be employed as a teacher or a worker with children under the age of 19, if:

a. on or after 1 November 1995 the person has pleaded guilty to, or has been found guilty of, a specified offence against or involving a child under 16 years of age; or has pleaded guilty to, or been found guilty of, an attempt to commit such an offence; and

b. the person was aged 18 or over when he or she committed the offence; and

c. the person was employed in relevant employment before, or at the time, he or she committed the offence, or was convicted.

18. For this purpose, a specified offence is one of the offences listed in Annex B.

What other behaviour or medical conditions are likely to lead to barring?

19. There is not a comprehensive definition of the kind of behaviour that will lead the Secretary of State to consider making a direction but, broadly speaking, it includes:

a. a conviction of a criminal offence;

b. behaviour which could lead to prosecution for a criminal offence; or

c. behaviour, which involves a breach of a teacher's position of trust, or a breach of the standards of propriety, expected of the profession.

20. Behaviour which might be regarded as coming within the last of these categories would include a sexual relationship with a pupil over the age of 16, falsifying pupil records, or assisting pupils to cheat or gain unfair advantage in examinations.

21. A person's sexual orientation or private sexual behaviour is not grounds for considering barring him or her, unless it raises questions about the safety or welfare of children.

22. Examples of the behaviour most likely to lead to barring include:

a. violent behaviour towards children or young people;

b. a sexual, or otherwise inappropriate, relationship with a pupil (regardless of whether the pupil is over the age of consent);

c. a sexual offence against someone over the age of 16;

d. any offence involving serious violence;

e. drug trafficking and other drug related offences;

f. stealing school property or monies;

g. deception in relation to employment as a teacher, or at a school or further education institution, for example false claims about qualifications, or failure to disclose past convictions;

h. a criminal conviction which results in a sentence of more than 12 months imprisonment;

i. repeated misconduct or multiple convictions, unless of a very minor nature.

23. Behaviour of the kind described above, or medical conditions, which directly or indirectly raise issues of risk or potential risk to the safety or welfare of children are most likely to lead the Secretary of State to consider making a direction on the ground that the person concerned is not a fit and proper person to be employed as a teacher or a worker with children.

24. Other behaviour of the kind described, which does not raise issues relating to the safety or welfare of children, will lead the Secretary of State to consider making a direction on grounds of misconduct. However, cases of that kind involving a teacher who is registered with the General Teaching Council for England or the General Teaching Council for Wales will be considered by the relevant Council in the first instance (see paragraph 63).

What is the purpose of barring?

25. There are three principal purposes:

a. to safeguard children and young people from contact with people who are considered unsuitable, either because the person presents a risk to their safety or welfare, or because the person's behaviour presents an unacceptable example to them;

b. to uphold the high standards of behaviour expected of members of the teaching profession; and

c. to protect schools and the education service generally from fraud or deception.

How is the Department informed of misconduct?

26. Either by a report from the person's employer or from the police. Teacher training institutions or further education institutions which provide courses of training for nursery nurses and other childcare workers might also report cases involving students on those courses. Information may also be received from other sources, for example, press reports, but in those cases we always seek verification from the employer and/or the police.

How does the Department deal with cases?

Automatic barring

27. As soon as the Secretary of State is notified that a person is included on the Protection of Children Act List, or receives confirmation that a person has been convicted of a specified offence and meets the relevant criteria, a direction is issued (see Annex B for details of the specified offences). The direction prohibits the person's subsequent appointment to, or employment in, relevant employment. If the person is in relevant employment at the time, the direction also requires the person's employer to terminate his or her employment.

Other cases

28. We will check whether there is a record of any previous convictions, or behaviour, which should be taken into account. We may also need to obtain supporting evidence, or further details from the police or employer in order to assess the seriousness of the behaviour, or alleged behaviour.

29. On the basis of the information we obtain, we will decide whether to take the matter further, and we will write to the person concerned either:

a. confirming that we have received a report from their employer, or the police, but will not be taking any action (in some cases we may also warn the person about the possible consequences of any similar behaviour in the future, or give them advice about their conduct); or

b. telling him or her what we know about his or her behaviour, or alleged behaviour, and what evidence we have received, and that we are considering whether to take action against him or her. The letter will also invite the person to make representations about the matter and, where appropriate, explain that we will also require a medical report.

What should representations include?

30. Our letter will explain that written representations can include an account of events from the person's perspective; the reasons why the person believes we should not issue a direction; supporting evidence; information about any mitigating factors; testimonials or references from friends or employers; a brief account of the person's career, and any other information that the person feels will be helpful to his or her case. However, it is up to each individual to decide whether to make representations, and what information and reports to include. We cannot insist that a person make representations, or dictate their form and content. Similarly, we cannot seek testimonials on the person's behalf, or meet the cost of providing representations.