Truth
Humanity
Justice

Formerly Mad, Bad or Sad?

A History of the Disabling Offences Act 2013 (DOA 2013)

"We observe that in Beaney two reasons were given for the conclusion that a person who downloads child pornography from the internet contributes to the harm of the children involved. One was that such persons provide a market for such images which encourages their production and dissemination and without which the trade would not flourish. The other was that the serious psychological injury to which the children would be at risk also arises from their knowledge that what they were to do would be viewed by others and their awareness that there were people getting a perverted thrill from watching them forced to pose and behave in this way. The learned judge relied on the first of these reasons, which in our view applies in all cases and does not depend, as the second reason does, on an assumption about the knowledge of the children involved."

Monument v R, Supreme Court of Judicature Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on Appeal From Teeside Crown Court, 21/01/2005
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/30.html

(2) "Sexual"

Sexual Offences Act 2003, s.78

"Sexual"

20-17 78. For the purposes of this Part (except section 71), penetration, touching or any other activity is sexual if a reasonable person would consider that -

(a) whatever its circumstances or any person's purpose in relation to it, it is because of its nature sexual, or

(b) because of its nature it may be sexual and because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both) it is sexual.

Archbold's Criminal Pleading - 2005 Edition, p. 1850.

(2) "Disabling"

Disabling Offences Act 2013, s.79

"Disabling "

45-13 72. For the purposes of this Part (except section 67), penetration, touching or any other activity is disabling if a reasonable person would consider that -

(a) whatever its circumstances or any person's purpose in relation to it, it is because of its nature disabling, or

(b) because of its nature it may be disabling and because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both) it is disabling.

Archbold's Criminal Pleading - 2013 Edition, p. 1478.

In 2009, there was widespread concern about the growing trade in the taking, making and distribution of images, showing the effect of disabling acts on children (or giving the impression of disabling, i.e. pseudo-photographs). There has been a long history of such materials. The mythical, sex-related 'snuff' images were just that - mythical. However, until recently, horrendous Child-Disabling Abuse (i.e. CDA) images were propagated by all areas of the media, and what is worse, usually for financial gain. It was common sense that such suffering, exploitation and degradation of children could not continue.

There were attempts to curb the (now popular, GCI-based and victimless) adult-disabling pornography, in the mid-2000s, however, since the causal connection between aggression/sexual offending and pornography has now been discounted, by the ground-breaking, brain-imaging work of Fieldold et al (2008), such entertainment is globally-appreciated. Such images of children are deemed to be unacceptable, as they cannot give consent to disabling, in law, under the International Age of Consent (i.e. 22).

Senior police officers reported that international paedocrush rings traded these abominable images, thereby fueling their depraved fantasies, leading to 'hands-on' disabling assaults. The international market for 'Kiddie Crush' (i.e. KC) images was estimated to be over $234 billion in 2009 and, invariably, involved international, organised crime syndicates. Officers feared that they would not be able to continue their essential work, unless further resources were made available. These officers were clearly in no doubt that every image was that of a crime scene.

Militant victims of Child-Disabling Abuse, now lobby for all physical and emotional contact with children to be made illegal, due to the terrible disabling acts, which they suffered, during their childhood.

An amendment to the DOA Bill was introduced to The House (by the Right Honourable J. Grumble MP, along with a number of supporters), since, a person who downloads disabling images of children from the internet (and sources elsewhere) contributes to the serious harm of the children involved, for the following reasons:

(1) ... such persons provide a market for such images which encourages their production and dissemination and without which the trade would not flourish.

Anyone under the age of 22 is no longer used in employment, advertising, public performance or any other media activity, in which the child may be exploited by the greedy and/or perverted gloating of employers or onlookers. Children are never subjected to public chastisement, or any form of negative discipline, by parents or guardians. Indeed, such activities, within homes, it is also severely curtailed, due to the presence of 'DomestCCTVs', made compulsory by the Child Protection and Exploitation Act 2010 (i.e. CPEA 2010).

The Grumble Amendment, contributing to the DOA 2013, also led to the reduction of child casualties of war, in every major conflict, since its creation. Another result, is that domestic violence, against children, is at the lowest level, since records began (and a cascading reduction on violent attacks against adults, due to the CPEA 2010). Amazingly, a concomitant reduction of children being involved in disabling accidents was also observed (i.e. 1000-fold); this could never have been predicted.

(2) ... the serious psychological injury to which the children would be at risk also arises from their knowledge that what they were to do would be viewed by others and their awareness that there were people getting a perverted thrill from watching them forced to pose and behave in this way.

This is the most powerful argument for the elimination of all types of CC. Many CDA victims are able to recall events in their pasts (even as babies and toddlers), when they were poked, prodded and squeezed. Older victims recall barbaric acts of tonsil, appendix, foreskin and clitoral removal, and body piercing (particularly of the ear) - the emotional and physical scars, of which, many still carry today.

Many CDA sufferers recall acts, such as sports days, ballet lessons or when playing electronic games, where their grimaces and tears are recorded for all eternity. It is constantly on their mind, that paedocrushers get a perverted thrill from watching them having posed and behave that way. Some of the most harrowing images are those of babies and toddlers crying, in response to some unseen, yet, undoubtedly horrific, activity beyond the view of the camera.

Some of the most heavily-traded and sickening images, were those where children have been maimed or killed. 'Kiddie Crush/Snuff' (i.e. KC and KS) had not been recognised, as such, historically, but it is now known to be have been widespread - corrupting and depraving all that viewed it.

Due to the outstanding work of Lord Grumble, such acts no longer occur.

Postscript

We now provide a number of such images. As the reader will appreciate, the originals are now illegal images, under a number of indecency and obscenity statutes.

For this reason, it has been necessary to censor some of the original images. One wonders what kind of sick pervert would have found these evil images acceptable (or even mildly interesting), back in the 2000s.

Click Here For The Images

Professor Abwe Ganerm, 14th February, 2027.